Scores and Comments
21.c.ps.170.721
Winter Park Historical Association, Inc
Application Details |
|
|---|---|
| Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
| Request Amount |
$23,407
|
| Total Score | 642.000 |
| Average Score | 91.714 |
Panelist Scores
| Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker Holly | 38 | 27 | 19 | 9 | 93 |
| Falwell Kerry | 36 | 26 | 15 | 5 | 82 |
| Hipschman Dorrie | 38 | 30 | 18 | 6 | 92 |
| Horowitz Sharon | 39 | 29 | 19 | 10 | 97 |
| McLane Preston | 38 | 28 | 19 | 6 | 91 |
| Overton Robert | 37 | 28 | 19 | 10 | 94 |
| Tomor Michael | 38 | 29 | 19 | 7 | 93 |
Comments |
|
|---|---|
| Baker Holly - Score: 93.000 | |
| I appreciate that your goals and objectives were very detailed. Your timeline was also very detailed. I would have liked more details in the accessibility section. | |
| Falwell Kerry - Score: 82.000 | |
| Application would be stronger if there was more detail about direct economic impact by the Association. More detail was needed to understand accessibility. | |
| Hipschman Dorrie - Score: 92.000 | |
| I would like more description of the accessibility accommodations. | |
| Horowitz Sharon - Score: 97.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |
| McLane Preston - Score: 91.000 | |
|
Excellent detail throughout. Reasonable, achievable goals, with a clearly established activities to goals metrics and path to program success. |
|
| Overton Robert - Score: 94.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |
| Tomor Michael - Score: 93.000 | |
|
Excellence: Summary is well done. Mission, Goals and Objectives are clear. The writer made it easy to understand what is happening at the WPHM. Partnerships are strong, timeline in place, collection summary could have been a bit more flushed out for the reader. How does one distinguish between hands-on school program objects and those conserved and preserved for exhibition and archives? Impact: Impact seems reasonable, marketing and promotion in place, and standard use of social media and hard-copy materials. Management: Curious about what happened with actual in-kind contributions between last fiscal year and the current and projected. It's quite a jump from $5.6K to $72.9K. Would have been helpful to know more. Accessibility: It appears the description is missing. This section allows for this to be flushed out for the reviewer. Compliance is not quite enough. |
|