Scores and Comments
19.c.ps.180.407
Artist Series Concerts of Sarasota, Inc.
Application Details |
|
|---|---|
| Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
| Request Amount |
$25,000
|
| Total Score | 357.000 |
| Average Score | 71.400 |
Panelist Scores
| Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cox Elaine | 35 | 25 | 16 | 6 | 82 |
| Jose Brian | 24 | 17 | 18 | 3 | 62 |
| Palkhivala Tania | 35 | 25 | 18 | 5 | 83 |
| Rivera Darren | 24 | 22 | 16 | 5 | 67 |
| Rusconi Ellen | 20 | 25 | 14 | 4 | 63 |
Comments |
|
|---|---|
| Cox Elaine - Score: 82.000 | |
|
This grant proposal is lacking information and detail. Would like to see examples of the types of programs you off in schools? Would like to see economic impact as well. For future grants I advise you use more of the space provided to speak to the impact you have on your community. |
|
| Jose Brian - Score: 62.000 | |
|
Good mission, but aftyer that there is very little detail in this section of the application. What are the goals for the organization and grant? What are the objectives, and how are they measuered? What does success look like? The partners look good, but the grant application would benefit from more detail. Again, the application lacks detail in the impact section. What is the economic impact? What are the details on the educational impact? There must be a more detailed expectation from the marketing plan. Applicant shows evidence of goof fiscal management. Accessibility area would benefit from more detail and evidence of training. |
|
| Palkhivala Tania - Score: 83.000 | |
|
While you have identified outputs (number of concerts), there are no measurable objectives (of success) of the organization's proposed programming during the grant period. There is no explanation of the economic impact (in the Proposal Impact section) of the organization or this proposal. In the future, the Arts & Economic Prosperity calculator could be useful to help articulate this information. It is critical that your organization completes the 504 Self Evaluation around Accessibility compliance. |
|
| Rivera Darren - Score: 67.000 | |
| The proposal suffers from a lack of goals, objectives and measurable outcomes. Health benefits to people living with Parkinson's disease is stated, but not backed up with research, evaluations (qualitative or quantitative) or letters of support. The marketing plan lacks specificity. The evaluation plan lacks detail. Greater efforts should be made to address and document matters related to accessibility. | |
| Rusconi Ellen - Score: 63.000 | |
|
Goals, Objectives need to be more clearly stated. Partnerships seems incomplete (marketing partnerships?) Timeline needs detail hard to evaluate level of artistry with so little detail High impact numbers This proposal needs a more detailed narrative and more in-depth responses to the questions posed in this application. No details in accessibility. No staff person for accessibility compliance |
|