Scores and Comments
19.c.ps.180.523
Polk Theatre, Inc.
Application Details |
|
---|---|
Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
Request Amount |
$90,000
|
Total Score | 462.000 |
Average Score | 92.400 |
Panelist Scores
Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cox Elaine | 38 | 29 | 19 | 9 | 95 |
Jose Brian | 37 | 29 | 15 | 8 | 89 |
Palkhivala Tania | 39 | 30 | 20 | 8 | 97 |
Rivera Darren | 38 | 29 | 16 | 8 | 91 |
Rusconi Ellen | 39 | 28 | 15 | 8 | 90 |
Comments |
|
---|---|
Cox Elaine - Score: 95.000 | |
Informative grant. You obviously have a grasp on the type of programming Lakeland needs. Thank you for preserving this theatre. Would like to see more about your family/educational programming as an attachment. |
|
Jose Brian - Score: 89.000 | |
Applicant does a good job highlighting goals and objectives. How will metrics be applied to these endeavors? Applicant does a good job highlighting partnerships. Applicant provided a very thorough "impact" section for this grant. I would like some guidance in Line 9A. A negative 41% delta year-to-year. Why? I have concerns about fiscal stability short of some additional detail on this matter. Otherwise applicant shows good evaluation methods. |
|
Palkhivala Tania - Score: 97.000 | |
{No comments provided.} | |
Rivera Darren - Score: 91.000 | |
The proposal was well written, organized and easy to read. Diverse programming in an important/historical structure strengthens impact. Evidence of strong community partnerships. Positive patron feedback on annual survey. |
|
Rusconi Ellen - Score: 90.000 | |
Goals and Objectives well linked and presented clearly. Activities are diverse and clear Partnerships are comprehensive and address many aspects of programming/presentling Timeline would be stronger if more fleshed out Impact number (audience) are high Additional Impact notes are helpful, particularly about rental etc. Proposal Impact - Strong case made for impact with many areas considered. Marketing and Evaluation strong $412K deficit in most recently completed FY. Good adjustment, but weakens case for management 504 review is not within the last 2 years
|