Scores and Comments

19.c.pr.180.058

Emit, Inc.

Application Details

Proposal TypeSpecific Cultural Project - Discipline-Based
Request Amount
$7,830
Total Score438.000
Average Score87.600

Panelist Scores

Panelist Excellence Impact Management Accessibility Total
Cox Elaine 36 23 18 10 87
Jose Brian 33 24 19 9 85
Palkhivala Tania 35 26 19 10 90
Rivera Darren 36 30 20 10 96
Rusconi Ellen 30 24 16 10 80

Comments

Cox Elaine - Score: 87.000

Even though we are quite a ways out from 2019, I appreciated that you had an idea of what you would offer. 

I would like to see your year-over-year growth. Your total individuals benefitting seems low for St. Petersburg. What can you add to your management and evaluation plans to see that you are attracting more people each year?

Jose Brian - Score: 85.000

Applicant does a good job of identifying goals and objectives. I would like to see more detail on the relationship of the partners.

I am having a little trouble discerning the impact and activities of EMIT from the St. Petersburg Jazz Festival. I, therefore, am struggling to score the impact section of grant

Applicant shows evidence of fiscal stability.

Palkhivala Tania - Score: 90.000
I imagine there are attendees from throughout Tampa Bay and beyond; it would be helpful for you to include those in the counties served section.
Rivera Darren - Score: 96.000

Strong partnerships through St. Petersburg College, and with other local organizations. Measurable outcomes, e.g, audience satisfaction with artists, facilities and marketing, and artist impressions of the St. Petersburg Jazz Festival vs other festivals, would strengthen the proposal. Strong impact on African-American students via workshops at Boys and Girls Club.

Rusconi Ellen - Score: 80.000

Goals are clear.  Objectives should be clear measurable targets

Partnerships could be more detailed to provide context of community partners

Timeline is not at all detailed

Economic impact is quantified by Americans for the Arts

Strong educational information

Would be better to include possible or past artists to inform reader of artistic quality

Marketing shows breadth.  Quantification (of social media or email list) would give reader context in this section.

Fiscal condition seems good with solvency for 21 years

Evaluation plan - good that it surveys audience and artists

Comprehensive accessibility