Scores and Comments
19.c.ps.180.656
Romanza-St. Augustine, Inc.
Application Details |
|
|---|---|
| Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
| Request Amount |
$50,000
|
| Total Score | 448.000 |
| Average Score | 89.600 |
Panelist Scores
| Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cox Elaine | 36 | 28 | 19 | 10 | 93 |
| Jose Brian | 31 | 27 | 18 | 8 | 84 |
| Palkhivala Tania | 37 | 29 | 20 | 10 | 96 |
| Rivera Darren | 37 | 24 | 19 | 10 | 90 |
| Rusconi Ellen | 35 | 26 | 14 | 10 | 85 |
Comments |
|
|---|---|
| Cox Elaine - Score: 93.000 | |
|
Diverse programming that offers something for everyone. Strong partnerships within the community. Strong metrics, positive growth. This applicant seems to be doing everything right. |
|
| Jose Brian - Score: 84.000 | |
|
There is plenty of evidence for activities, but no goal and objectives are shown. Further, there are few metrics to define success. This is a long list of partners, but what are the relationships and expectations? The "Excellence" section does not provide adequate information for this reviewer. Proposal shows significant attendance, and although a zero is missing, I read this at $5million in economic impact. Little educational impact id demonstrated in grant application. How is feedback from evaluations used for decision-making? |
|
| Palkhivala Tania - Score: 96.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |
| Rivera Darren - Score: 90.000 | |
|
Nice to see local young artists being incorporated into performances/activities with visiting artists. Quantifying the economic impact of activities would strengthen the proposal. Good sources of public funding, but private grants seem to be lacking. |
|
| Rusconi Ellen - Score: 85.000 | |
|
Goals and objectives should be reviewed for understanding. Activities sound dynamic and specific to the communities. Would like to know more about the quality. Partners - more information on the roles. Are these just performing orgs? Are they marketing partners? Please give a better idea of the many types of partnerships you use to produce this wonderful work. Timeline - more details on producing aspects would be stronger Audience numbers do not add up How many professional artists and how many amateur/student artists? This ratio would give context. Is everyone paid? Are the students paid? Are the Young Performers paid? Proposal Impact - financial impact should be better-quantified for this level of request. Better assessment of economic impact would strengthen this grant. If it stimulates cultural and heritage tourism, the impact is most likely greater than $5000. Advertising analytics data is impressive and very helpful to the reader. Fiscal Condition - consistent increase in regional funding shows strong support Evaluation plan - very strong and good data No paid staff? Not eligible for a grant this large. And how then is there a staff person for accessibility compliance? Proposal Budget - this does not seem complete
|
|