Scores and Comments

19.c.ps.500.124

Application Details
Proposal Type	General Program Support - Local Arts Agency
Request Amount	$57,155
Total Score	530.000
Average Score	88.333

Panelist	Excellence	Impact	Management	Accessibility	Total
Coffey Tamara	34	28	17	9	88
Cuyler Antonio C.	40	20	15	10	85
Ford Shannon	35	25	16	6	82
Hoesing Jennifer	35	25	18	8	86
Killoren Michael	38	28	18	10	94
White Paula	38	30	18	9	95

Comments
Coffey Tamara - Score: 88.000
{No comments provided.}
Cuyler Antonio C. - Score: 85.000
Your response to the question regarding 25% of the population benefitting from your program seems inaccurate given that 83.6% of your county's population is White. I am also curious about how you engage people of color on your board, staff, and in your programming. Without answers to these questions, I cannot fully assess the real impact of your proposal. You have noteworthy goals. Why not use the evaluation plan to explicitly discuss how you assess your performance of them? Why do the costs for personnel increase?
Ford Shannon - Score: 82.000
How exactly does the EdExplore SRQ site work?
Hoesing Jennifer - Score: 86.000
It would be helpful to see measurable benchmarks for the grant period included in the goals, objectives and activities. Other applicants have made strong cases by tying their 18-19 activities to their strategic plans fitting the same timeline. Great timeline! Easy to understand! I would love more details on the impact numbers - not just in your application but in all. 700,000 served in 132 events is an impressive impact. Nice to see an increase in marketing budget - these expenses are critical to getting the word out about arts organizations and activities.
Killoren Michael - Score: 94.000
Long standing LAA, solid programs, clarity of purpose, good community support.
White Paula - Score: 95.000
{No comments provided.}