Scores and Comments

19.c.ps.500.205

The Arts Council, Inc.

Application Details
Proposal Type	General Program Support - Local Arts Agency
Request Amount	$57,500
Total Score	539.000
Average Score	89.833

Panelist Scores

Panelist	Excellence	Impact	Management	Accessibility	Total
Coffey Tamara	34	28	17	9	88
Cuyler Antonio C.	40	20	15	10	85
Ford Shannon	35	26	18	7	86
Hoesing Jennifer	38	29	19	9	95
Killoren Michael	35	25	16	9	85
White Paula	40	30	20	10	100

Comments
Coffey Tamara - Score: 88.000
{No comments provided.}
Cuyler Antonio C. - Score: 85.000
I appreciate that you acknowledge that your county's White residents likely benefits those most from your efforts. However, what efforts have you made to engage the 21% of your population that identifies as of color on your board and staff, and in your programming? Without this it is difficult to assess the true extent of your proposal's impact. Your evaluation plan should address how you assess your performance on the noteworthy goals you articulated at the beginning of your proposal. What explains the increase in costs of personnel?
Ford Shannon - Score: 86.000
Who sits on the Arts Education Committee and how does it support arts education programming, planning and advocacy?
Hoesing Jennifer - Score: 95.000
Excellent mission and vision statements. Congratulations on your endowment success - an important step for all organizations to be as sustainable as possible. Seeing the accessibility accommodations as a line item in the project budget (matched with cash dollar for dollar and then some) speaks to your organization's dedication to access. Thank you for your leadership. Great application. Thank you!
Killoren Michael - Score: 85.000
LAA appears to have clear sense of purpose and role in community; primarily as presenter, but also stimulating dialogue and elevating community dialogue and promoting arts and culture - doing a lot with exisiting resources.
White Paula - Score: 100.000
{No comments provided.}