Scores and Comments
19.c.ps.114.346
City of Oakland Park
Application Details |
|
---|---|
Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
Request Amount |
$25,000
|
Total Score | 473.000 |
Average Score | 78.833 |
Panelist Scores
Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Black Thomas | 30 | 28 | 15 | 8 | 81 |
Geitner Robert | 32 | 24 | 18 | 8 | 82 |
Iles Delma | 20 | 22 | 19 | 8 | 69 |
Rodante Leigh | 36 | 28 | 18 | 7 | 89 |
Sabo Jennifer | 25 | 19 | 16 | 9 | 69 |
Young Elizabeth | 32 | 26 | 17 | 8 | 83 |
Comments |
|
---|---|
Black Thomas - Score: 81.000 | |
In general, this application lacks detail. The potential for strong programming appears to exist, but the application is not descriptive enough. |
|
Geitner Robert - Score: 82.000 | |
{No comments provided.} | |
Iles Delma - Score: 69.000 | |
Goals, objectives and activities are all mixed together, not clearly defined. No description of the actual activities - very vague. 32 artists - no artist bios
|
|
Rodante Leigh - Score: 89.000 | |
{No comments provided.} | |
Sabo Jennifer - Score: 69.000 | |
Add a stronger explanation of your programs, objectives, and partnerships. The impact answer was very vague and does not include any hard numbers on economic impact nor statistics on educational impact. This makes judging the impact very hard. Make sure to explain how your programs, not just your space, are accessible and remember to use access symbols on your marketing materials. |
|
Young Elizabeth - Score: 83.000 | |
goals, objectives and activities could be further detailed. Accessibility section would benefit with more information on ages served, more concrete numbers for your proposed events... good work on all that has been accomplished. |