Scores and Comments

19.c.ps.105.582

Florida Gulf Coast University Board of Trustees

Application Details
Proposal TypeGeneral Program Support - Discipline-Based
Request Amount
$37,500
Total Score628.000
Average Score89.714

Panelist Scores

Panelist Excellence Impact Management Accessibility Total
Clercx Byron 31 25 15 10 81
Dodds Jed 36 24 17 8 85
Harder Lee Ellen 37 29 19 10 95
Krivinchuk Jeremiah 34 28 19 8 89
Packard Lisa 38 26 18 10 92
Ryan Sara 38 28 18 9 93
Sanfilippo Amanda 36 27 20 10 93

Comments
Clercx Byron - Score: 81.000

Excellence:

  • The mission statement is clear, aspirational and has programs/activities that fully support the mission
  • Clearly describes partnerships (albeit briefly)
  • Activities also not clearly denoted on the page and measurable objectives were listed in narrative format
  • Consider adding quantitative targets and stretch targets to your assessment process and proposal organization and formatting.

Impact:

  • Provides some useful economic impact data (The last economic study of Florida Gulf Coast University to Charlotte, Collier, Glades, Hendry, and Lee Counties for the fiscal year of 2012-2013 was: $422 million in overall expenditures; 3,723 jobs created; and $154 million in labor income).
  • Consider emphasizing and/or expanding your organizations ROI by referencing the American’s for the Arts, Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 report which are embedded with compelling statistical data, testimonials, case studies and a useful economic prosperity calculator.
  • Marketing and educational outreach activities are appropriate for the size/scope of the program/project
  • Appropriate numbers of individuals would benefit from this program.

Management:

  • Very confident in the organizations fiscal stability and ability to carry out the proposed program/projects
  • Evaluation methods are not fully measurable and it is unclear how collected data would be assessed
  • Very minimal concerns about event sustainability

Accessibility:

  • Appears to meet ADA accessibility criteria (504 Self Eval, compliance staff person, etc.)
Dodds Jed - Score: 85.000
Program quality is solid for a University Gallery. Limited evidence of outreach to non-University audiences.
Harder Lee Ellen - Score: 95.000
{No comments provided.}
Krivinchuk Jeremiah - Score: 89.000
Goals and objectives are there but not immediately clear.  
Packard Lisa - Score: 92.000
{No comments provided.}
Ryan Sara - Score: 93.000

Excellence: Strong synopsis, mission, and introduction to goals section with very direct language and strong action words. Clear breakdown of activities, but would have liked to have seen goals more clearly indicated/pulled out from the rest of the text. Many of the objectives let me asking how or by how much. The timeline could be more specific/more flushed out.

Impact: Impressive five-county service area. Wish there was economic impact data for the art galleries as opposed to the university overall. 

Management: Could be strengthened by reporting how the donor base has grown over the last few years.

Accessibility: Could be strengthened by adding detail about specific accommodations that have been made
Sanfilippo Amanda - Score: 93.000

Hard to justify international artists in the program; perhaps put more focus in mission statement on local and regional 

Great that doing guest curators, writers and artists and paying them