Scores and Comments
19.c.ps.105.748
621 Gallery, Inc.
Application Details |
|
---|---|
Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
Request Amount |
$19,214
|
Total Score | 622.000 |
Average Score | 88.857 |
Panelist Scores
Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clercx Byron | 32 | 27 | 12 | 10 | 81 |
Dodds Jed | 38 | 29 | 16 | 8 | 91 |
Harder Lee Ellen | 32 | 27 | 16 | 10 | 85 |
Krivinchuk Jeremiah | 37 | 28 | 17 | 10 | 92 |
Packard Lisa | 32 | 27 | 16 | 10 | 85 |
Ryan Sara | 39 | 29 | 18 | 9 | 95 |
Sanfilippo Amanda | 36 | 27 | 20 | 10 | 93 |
Comments |
|
---|---|
Clercx Byron - Score: 81.000 | |
Excellence:
Impact:
Management:
Accessibility:
|
|
Dodds Jed - Score: 91.000 | |
Fresh programming and seemingly genuine commitment to diversity. Unfortunate financial situation: any updates? |
|
Harder Lee Ellen - Score: 85.000 | |
-Mission statement unclear -ambitious schedule with small and some new staff -would suggest expanding evaluation processes with surveys reaching a broader audience (members, community at large, etc.) -previous director incurred significant debt (20% of operating budget). What are the policies regarding oversight? -timeline seems to be outside of grant period (Sept 2018 to August 2019 |
|
Krivinchuk Jeremiah - Score: 92.000 | |
Clear goals and objectives. Concern with timely reporting with a 60 days late mark for previous general program grant. | |
Packard Lisa - Score: 85.000 | |
Two problems they present need to be remedied internally and probably not with a state grant. 1. "The Gallery cannot continue to rely on the goodwill of board members." Board members are there to raise funds. Consider looking at your by-laws and examining the size of your board, is it the right mix of people from varied locations, and term limits. Fundraising is the #1 goal of a nonprofit board. You have several other grants at play so you are not relying on the goodwill of board members. You show $36,500 in private support revenue with zero corporate support. That is a major hole that needs to be addressed by your board. 2. The astronomical increase in rent needed to be explained. It may be time to relocate. |
|
Ryan Sara - Score: 95.000 | |
Excellence: synopsis, mission, goals, objectives and activities very clearly stated and measurable. Repeated information in partnerships and timeline. Partnership section would have been stronger if you detailed the nature of the partnership. Impact: The number of proposal events was lower than expected based on what was listed under activities. Would have been helpful to see what went into the 13 versus the 75 opportunities for public participation. Management: Liked that you directly addressed the threat created by the rent increase. Was expecting to see the personnel expenses increase in your operational budget. Is something you are addressing in this funding cycle? Accessibility: Could be strengthen through dedicated outreach. |
|
Sanfilippo Amanda - Score: 93.000 | |
{No comments provided.} |