Scores and Comments

19.c.ps.105.267

Ormond Memorial Art Museum, Inc.

Application Details

Proposal TypeGeneral Program Support - Discipline-Based
Request Amount
$21,769
Total Score640.000
Average Score91.429

Panelist Scores

Panelist Excellence Impact Management Accessibility Total
Clercx Byron 34 27 16 10 87
Dodds Jed 33 25 18 9 85
Harder Lee Ellen 39 29 19 10 97
Krivinchuk Jeremiah 38 27 19 10 94
Packard Lisa 38 30 18 10 96
Ryan Sara 35 28 18 8 89
Sanfilippo Amanda 35 27 20 10 92

Comments

Clercx Byron - Score: 87.000

Excellence:

  • OMAM’s Mission statement aptly and concisely describes the organization
  • Offering an educational experience in connection with each exhibit (workshops, gallery walk, and/or outreach activities) based around the art on display is an excellent way to grow your attendance, membership, and audience participation. The experiential activities may help them appreciate/retain the information and/or entice them to become donors, friends of the museum, and tell others about their experience).
  • Alternatively, at times, the goals and activities were used interchangeably, which made it hard to decipher the intent.
  • The list of OMAM’s Partners is impressive and they are clearly listed with adequate descriptions of the contributions and value of the activities and/or relationship.
  • Very minimal concerns about the organizations ability to carry out the programing

Impact:

  • OMAM's impact on the local economy was enhanced by referencing AFTA’s Arts & Economic Prosperity 5 (prosperity calculator),  but a broader and more credible ROI can be achieved by AFTA's full-report filled with compelling quotes, statistical data, case studies).
  • Educational and outreach components serve the community and are appropriate.
  • The marketing and promotion plan (as proposed) will be appropriate and effective.
  • Confident in the organizations ability to carry out the proposal and sustain the event.

Management:

  • Evaluation Plan:
    • The intro about personnel performance evaluations does not seem relevant
    • Try to define what specific information the volunteer board of directors uses to guide decisions about goal setting?
    • Consider bringing in an external consultant to talk about strategic planning and assessment

 

Accessibility

  • Appears to meet ADA accessibility criteria (504 Self Eval, compliance staff person, etc.)
Dodds Jed - Score: 85.000

Commitment to healing power of art appears genuine. Quality of programming could be stronger, or hard to determine from grant.

Harder Lee Ellen - Score: 97.000
{No comments provided.}
Krivinchuk Jeremiah - Score: 94.000
Clear and achievable goals.
Packard Lisa - Score: 96.000
{No comments provided.}
Ryan Sara - Score: 89.000

Excellence: Strong synopsis and mission statement. In operation since 1946. Goals and objectives can be communicated more clearly. By listing some goals before your activities and some within, it become difficult to follow. Under outreach, why are your objectives measured in educational hours? Is that the best way to demonstrate quality or scale of of offerings? Under Art of Healing in partnerships section, liked that you listed past projects to contextualize. Was unsure how Dogapalooza event was tied to your mission.

Impact: Strong economic and outreach impact. Could strengthen education section by listing number of classes instead of hours of education (or both).

Management: Very strong fiscal condition between operating reserves, endowment, assets, and lack of long term liability. Are you concerned that you do not own the building but are paying for major additions? Do you have a long-term lease?

Accessibility: Strong outreach programming. Does not mention whether the space is ADA compliant.

Sanfilippo Amanda - Score: 92.000

difficult to justify a local, national, international program 

clearly a beloved community space 

Might recommend rebranding as community and contemporary craft center