Scores and Comments
19.c.ps.105.287
The Armory Art Center, Inc.
Application Details |
|
---|---|
Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
Request Amount |
$150,000
|
Total Score | 629.000 |
Average Score | 89.857 |
Panelist Scores
Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Clercx Byron | 35 | 25 | 17 | 10 | 87 |
Dodds Jed | 37 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 91 |
Harder Lee Ellen | 39 | 29 | 18 | 8 | 94 |
Krivinchuk Jeremiah | 38 | 28 | 19 | 10 | 95 |
Packard Lisa | 32 | 22 | 15 | 10 | 79 |
Ryan Sara | 33 | 27 | 18 | 10 | 88 |
Sanfilippo Amanda | 37 | 28 | 20 | 10 | 95 |
Comments |
|
---|---|
Clercx Byron - Score: 87.000 | |
Excellence:
Impact:
Management:
Accessibility:
|
|
Dodds Jed - Score: 91.000 | |
Well conceived, concrete goals and strategies. Impressive array of education opportunities, and ambition to keep improving them. What are the remaining operating expenses (over $1M?)? Might have benefited from stronger support materials, eg. documentation of facilities, exhibitions, class outcomes. | |
Harder Lee Ellen - Score: 94.000 | |
{No comments provided.} | |
Krivinchuk Jeremiah - Score: 95.000 | |
Overall strong proposal. The budget does not clearly reflect the dollars needed to recruit and hire faculty to guide the integration of technology as it relates to Goal 1. | |
Packard Lisa - Score: 79.000 | |
I am concerned that you are asking for a very high amount for an application that shows a heavy administrative budget, low impact on number of people served, and zero corporate donations and the slight majority of your program budget tilts on the administrative hiring side. With nearly a $3M operating budget, I think there is room for a discussion about managing the budget better. |
|
Ryan Sara - Score: 88.000 | |
Excellence: Action oriented goals. Combining the objectives and the timeline made it confusing to read. The timeline was out of order and some objectives were harder to measure than others (recruit two students per session versus target pre-school students). No context provided in partnership section. Impact: Demonstrated positive professional trajectory for artists. Strong outreach partners but did not describe programs. Management: Own building, permanent endowment. Do you have cash reserves? Under your evaluation plan, why aren't surveys utilized after all programs instead of most? Accessibility: Strong accessibility programming. |
|
Sanfilippo Amanda - Score: 95.000 | |
{No comments provided.} |