---

Scores and Comments

19.c.ps.170.486

Loxahatchee River Historical Society, Inc.

Application Details
Proposal Type	General Program Support - Discipline-Based
Request Amount	$133,000
Total Score	644.000
Average Score	92.000

Panelist Scores

Panelist	Excellence	Impact	Management	Accessibility	Total
Esler Jennifer	32	27	19	8	86
Gelman Elizabeth	40	27	18	10	95
Hughes Michael	36	26	18	9	89
Joseph Samuel	37	27	19	10	93
Norton Heather	40	28	19	9	96
Overton Robert	38	29	19	10	96
Wolfe Bell Erin	36	28	17	8	89

Comments
Esler Jennifer - Score: 86.000
Goals and activities support mission, but they are merely described and not identified clearly as activities that achieve the goals. In terms of impact, I was wishing the proposal was organized better. Impressive marketing efforts! The organization is in good financial shape with good evaluation planned for this nonspecific grant request. Had to score lower on accessibility due to review within last five years (and not two years).
Gelman Elizabeth - Score: 95.000
would like to have heard how you use assessment tools, perhaps an example as well
Hughes Michael - Score: 89.000
Commendable and significant outreach to Mayan and African American communities. Significant attendance.
Joseph Samuel - Score: 93.000
It is important that applicants submit letters of support from their stakeholders, partners, and/or constituents to show outside commitment for their work.
Norton Heather - Score: 96.000
Goals, strategies, and partnerships were clearly delineated and explained. Impacts and Management were also detailed. Evaluation strategies could be bolstered by additional guest studies that are facilitated by staff or volunteers. The only danger with a kiosk or using review platforms such as trip advisor is it is a passive mechanism and typically only provides feedback that is very positive or very negative. Visitor observations, panels, questionaires, etc allow for feedback tailored to improvements and learning outcomes. 1 pt. was deducted from Accessibility due to date of 504 Self Evaluation.
Overton Robert - Score: 96.000
{No comments provided.}
Wolfe Bell Erin - Score: 89.000
{No comments provided.}