Scores and Comments

19.c.ps.170.645

Application Details
Proposal Type	General Program Support - Discipline-Based
Request Amount	$150,000
Total Score	650.000
Average Score	92.857

Panelist	Excellence	Impact	Management	Accessibility	Total
Esler Jennifer	36	29	18	9	92
Gelman Elizabeth	40	27	20	10	97
Hughes Michael	37	28	19	9	93
Joseph Samuel	38	29	19	9	95
Norton Heather	38	28	19	9	94
Overton Robert	37	26	18	8	89
Wolfe Bell Erin	36	28	18	8	90

Comments
Esler Jennifer - Score: 92.000
The description of this excellent museum is intriguing and I cannot wait to visit. However, the goals, objectives and activities, while good, were not logically clear to me. The Gardens serve a high number of people. Is it possible to identify specific economic impact numbers? Solid financial management; little concern they can achieve goals. Even with the challenges of a 90 year old attraction, the Gardens are accommodating a variety of visitors and have plans for improvement.
Gelman Elizabeth - Score: 97.000
{No comments provided.}
Hughes Michael - Score: 93.000
More information on the "exhibits and workshops by 50+...artists" would be helpful. It's difficult to determine what is too ambitious or superfluous to the mission statement. More information on institution's role in collaborations with Broward County on literacy would be helpful. Significant visitation.
Joseph Samuel - Score: 95.000
The reviewer was impressed with the applicants dedicated focus on serving under-served and special needs populations.
Norton Heather - Score: 94.000
Clearly articulated mission and goals with objectives to meet them. Removed a few points from management section due to financials. I have some questions about the Additional Operating Budget justifications provided. Additionally 1 point was deducted from Accessibility due to 504 Self Evaluation date.
Overton Robert - Score: 89.000
{No comments provided.}
Wolfe Bell Erin - Score: 90.000
{No comments provided.}