Scores and Comments
19.c.ps.170.498
Cade Creativity Labs, Inc.
Application Details |
|
---|---|
Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
Request Amount |
$25,000
|
Total Score | 613.000 |
Average Score | 87.571 |
Panelist Scores
Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Esler Jennifer | 33 | 23 | 18 | 10 | 84 |
Gelman Elizabeth | 32 | 24 | 17 | 10 | 83 |
Hughes Michael | 35 | 25 | 17 | 10 | 87 |
Joseph Samuel | 36 | 27 | 20 | 10 | 93 |
Norton Heather | 36 | 25 | 18 | 10 | 89 |
Overton Robert | 35 | 25 | 16 | 9 | 85 |
Wolfe Bell Erin | 37 | 27 | 18 | 10 | 92 |
Comments |
|
---|---|
Esler Jennifer - Score: 84.000 | |
While activities fit mission, measurable objectives are not strongly described in the application. How can you measure inspiring creative thinking and invention? Application describes cultural services to a community that are reasonable; marketing and numbers served are on the lower side comparatively speaking. So impressed with use of consultant to help with evaluation, but not sure what the measures are from the proposal. Also, creative thinking to use Tax Credits for new building. | |
Gelman Elizabeth - Score: 83.000 | |
Very good in terms of mission and programming goals and objectives. Sounds like the work you are doing is creative and needed. I got lost in the management area reading your budgets. In the grant application, revenue from admissions seems extraordinarily high. Looking at your supporting budgets, the admission/programs numbers are different and the bulk of fundraising is projected to come from the gala at a huge leap from the past year. Your expenses for accounting are very high but that expertise is not reflected in this grant application. | |
Hughes Michael - Score: 87.000 | |
Having more information on the classes would be helpful. |
|
Joseph Samuel - Score: 93.000 | |
The reviewer needed additional budget details to address issues such as the massive increase in Admissions revenue projections. Although the applicant provided letters of support, the reviewer would have like to see more submissions from the partners mentioned in the proposal. |
|
Norton Heather - Score: 89.000 | |
The grant funding would be used in part to fund a new program support member. It is unclear how these funds will aid in the long term sustainability of the position. Also, there is a significant increase in proposed revenue generation from admission sales in FY19 (from 35,000 to 928,000). Opening a new building and launching new programs can sometimes take time to grow. | |
Overton Robert - Score: 85.000 | |
{No comments provided.} | |
Wolfe Bell Erin - Score: 92.000 | |
{No comments provided.} |