Scores and Comments

19.c.ps.170.499

Application Details
Proposal Type	General Program Support - Discipline-Based
Request Amount	$150,000
Total Score	660.000
Average Score	94.286

Panelist	Excellence	Impact	Management	Accessibility	Total
Esler Jennifer	40	28	18	9	95
Gelman Elizabeth	38	30	20	10	98
Hughes Michael	35	28	19	9	91
Joseph Samuel	38	27	20	10	95
Norton Heather	37	30	19	10	96
Overton Robert	37	27	18	9	91
Wolfe Bell Erin	38	29	18	9	94

Comments
Esler Jennifer - Score: 95.000
Very clear goals, objectives and activities sated. Provides significant, not vital, programs and exhibitions. Excellent marketing. Minimal concerns about sustainability--will expansion overextend the endowment and/or community's ability to support? Had to knock a point off of accessibility due to one year ago review of accessibility survey.
Gelman Elizabeth - Score: 98.000
{No comments provided.}
Hughes Michael - Score: 91.000
Is the lack of information on planned exhibitions due to uncertainty with the construction? Do the committees providing oversight reflect the diversity of Palm Beach County?
Joseph Samuel - Score: 95.000
{No comments provided.}
Norton Heather - Score: 96.000
Rich detail describing goals, strategies and activities for the most part. Some of the strategies and activities tied to goals did not always include a measurable outcome but was a little broad (ex. Create an exciting and diverse lineup of exhibition and programs. How many? What is the current lineup?). Also in the Financials - why is there no admission revenue in FY18 and FY19? According to the application the museum will be open with reduced hours in FY18 and reopen to the public in Feb 2019.
Overton Robert - Score: 91.000
{No comments provided.}
Wolfe Bell Erin - Score: 94.000
{No comments provided.}