Scores and Comments
19.c.ps.170.460
Vizcaya Museum
Application Details |
|
---|---|
Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
Request Amount |
$150,000
|
Total Score | 670.000 |
Average Score | 95.714 |
Panelist Scores
Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Esler Jennifer | 40 | 29 | 18 | 10 | 97 |
Gelman Elizabeth | 39 | 27 | 20 | 10 | 96 |
Hughes Michael | 38 | 28 | 19 | 10 | 95 |
Joseph Samuel | 38 | 30 | 19 | 10 | 97 |
Norton Heather | 40 | 28 | 19 | 10 | 97 |
Overton Robert | 38 | 28 | 19 | 8 | 93 |
Wolfe Bell Erin | 39 | 28 | 19 | 9 | 95 |
Comments |
|
---|---|
Esler Jennifer - Score: 97.000 | |
Proposal perfectly describes goals, objectives and activities. Although activities are not vital, they have an impressive cultural and economic impact on the community. Minimal concern with the management transition described, otherwise no concern. | |
Gelman Elizabeth - Score: 96.000 | |
{No comments provided.} | |
Hughes Michael - Score: 95.000 | |
Excellent economic impact model. I appreciate the use of outside evaluators for programs. Capital campaign is a significant undertaking and support appears solid. |
|
Joseph Samuel - Score: 97.000 | |
The applicant presents creative programming options that utilize facilities, collections and the grounds to educate and engage all. Great job building meaningful and lasting community partnerships. Excellent collections management plan The reviewer would have liked more info about the applicant's migration to private non-profit institution. It is important that applicants submit letters of support from their stakeholders, partners, and/or constituents to show outside commitment for their work. |
|
Norton Heather - Score: 97.000 | |
Well defined mission and goals. Clear objectives and strategies tied to grant goals. Financials posed a few questions which the expanded description of changes to expenses and revenues did not entirely resolve. Unclear about several variances in the budget description. Programs seem in line with the efforts and goals of the institution and their capacity to reach audiences. | |
Overton Robert - Score: 93.000 | |
{No comments provided.} | |
Wolfe Bell Erin - Score: 95.000 | |
{No comments provided.} |