Scores and Comments

19.c.ps.170.672

Application Details
Proposal Type	General Program Support - Discipline-Based
Request Amount	$106,121
Total Score	645.000
Average Score	92.143

Panelist	Excellence	Impact	Management	Accessibility	Total
Esler Jennifer	37	27	18	10	92
Gelman Elizabeth	38	25	19	10	92
Hughes Michael	36	27	19	10	92
Joseph Samuel	37	27	19	10	93
Norton Heather	40	24	20	9	93
Overton Robert	37	28	19	8	92
Wolfe Bell Erin	38	25	19	9	91

Comments
Esler Jennifer - Score: 92.000
Not sure the proposal described proposed programs, but still excellent. Goals support mission and are stated clearly. Provides significant and appropriate services to the area. They serve a LOT of people for their budget size. I wonder what the contracted services are (it is a high income number)?
Gelman Elizabeth - Score: 92.000
{No comments provided.}
Hughes Michael - Score: 92.000
The outreach and inclusion was great to see. Would like to see more on the exhibitions planned.
Joseph Samuel - Score: 93.000
The reviewer needed more information about partnerships listed in proposal. It is important that applicants submit letters of support from their stakeholders, partners, and/or constituents to show outside commitment for their work.
Norton Heather - Score: 93.000
Well defined mission and goals. Clear objectives and strategies tied to grant goals. Financial management shows clear plan for growth and removal of dependency on city funds. Programs seem in line with the efforts and goals of the institution and their capacity to reach audiences. Under Accessibility removed 1 pt for Abbreviated Accessibility Checklist completed in last 5 yrs.
Overton Robert - Score: 92.000
{No comments provided.}
Wolfe Bell Erin - Score: 91.000
{No comments provided.}