Scores and Comments
19.c.ps.170.182
University of Miami
Application Details |
|
|---|---|
| Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
| Request Amount |
$150,000
|
| Total Score | 645.000 |
| Average Score | 92.143 |
Panelist Scores
| Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esler Jennifer | 37 | 26 | 18 | 9 | 90 |
| Gelman Elizabeth | 39 | 27 | 20 | 9 | 95 |
| Hughes Michael | 35 | 26 | 20 | 9 | 90 |
| Joseph Samuel | 37 | 25 | 20 | 10 | 92 |
| Norton Heather | 39 | 23 | 20 | 10 | 92 |
| Overton Robert | 38 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 92 |
| Wolfe Bell Erin | 38 | 28 | 19 | 9 | 94 |
Comments |
|
|---|---|
| Esler Jennifer - Score: 90.000 | |
| Goals and objectives are clearly stated, but I would have liked a better connection to specific activities. Solid marketing plan and appropriate level of participation for a University Museum. Would like to see specifics $$ on economic impact. Would also like to know more about line 9 expenses. Due to University control and its endowment, little concerns about sustainability. Great Accessibility in a variety of ways. Need to update the checklist for a higher score. | |
| Gelman Elizabeth - Score: 95.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |
| Hughes Michael - Score: 90.000 | |
| Pleasantly humble. Good example of an institution pursuing excellence. More information on programs would be helpful. | |
| Joseph Samuel - Score: 92.000 | |
|
This applicant needs to establish more local partnerships throughout Miami-Dade County and South Florida to help broaden their impact. |
|
| Norton Heather - Score: 92.000 | |
| Clearly articulated goals and strategies. Impact is constricted by visitors served and direct contribution to economic contribution to Miami-Dade. | |
| Overton Robert - Score: 92.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |
| Wolfe Bell Erin - Score: 94.000 | |
|
Strong evaluation plan. Strong accessibility section. |
|