Scores and Comments

19.c.ps.170.457

Application Details
Proposal Type	General Program Support - Discipline-Based
Request Amount	$110,000
Total Score	639.000
Average Score	91.286

Panelist	Excellence	Impact	Management	Accessibility	Total
Esler Jennifer	36	28	19	8	91
Gelman Elizabeth	36	27	18	10	91
Hughes Michael	35	25	15	9	84
Joseph Samuel	38	28	19	9	94
Norton Heather	40	27	18	9	94
Overton Robert	38	28	18	9	93
Wolfe Bell Erin	37	28	19	8	92

Comments
Esler Jennifer - Score: 91.000
While goals and objectives are stated, it is not made clear how the activities will achieve the goals. Perhaps explain reasoning why exhibits and programs were selected to achieve the goals? Solid impact described, as well as marketing efforts. Sound management in terms of finances and evaluation processes. Need to update the 504 evaluation!
Gelman Elizabeth - Score: 91.000
The administrative expenses of your budget so far outweigh programmatic that I urge you to review your classifications with your auditor.
Hughes Michael - Score: 84.000
The strategic goals outlined were not followed by supplemental information to inform on what actions are taking place. The goals outlined aligned but not exactly correlated.
Joseph Samuel - Score: 94.000
The reviewer needed more information about the listed partnerships. The reviewer needed more budget details to address some issues in the submitted budget (i.e. large admin expenses as compared to programmatic)
Norton Heather - Score: 94.000
Cleary articulated mission, goals and objectives. Accessibility lost 1 point due to 504 Self Evaluation completed in last 5 years.
Overton Robert - Score: 93.000
{No comments provided.}
Wolfe Bell Erin - Score: 92.000
{No comments provided.}