Scores and Comments
19.c.ps.170.530
The University of South Florida
Application Details |
|
|---|---|
| Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
| Request Amount |
$150,000
|
| Total Score | 626.000 |
| Average Score | 89.429 |
Panelist Scores
| Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esler Jennifer | 40 | 27 | 18 | 8 | 93 |
| Gelman Elizabeth | 40 | 25 | 20 | 9 | 94 |
| Hughes Michael | 34 | 24 | 16 | 9 | 83 |
| Joseph Samuel | 37 | 28 | 20 | 10 | 95 |
| Norton Heather | 40 | 19 | 20 | 8 | 87 |
| Overton Robert | 38 | 25 | 18 | 9 | 90 |
| Wolfe Bell Erin | 37 | 25 | 16 | 6 | 84 |
Comments |
|
|---|---|
| Esler Jennifer - Score: 93.000 | |
| Excellent connection of programs to mission and very specific description. The quality and diversity of programs is enormous, if not measured compelling yet by dollars (study is in process). More specific evaluation information would be helpful. Would like more details about accessibility. | |
| Gelman Elizabeth - Score: 94.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |
| Hughes Michael - Score: 83.000 | |
| The attendance figures, are those accurate? Seems low, is the museum closed during part of the year? The range of exhibitions is good, but the outreach to underserved communities isn't communicated. Does the museum have an advisory board? | |
| Joseph Samuel - Score: 95.000 | |
|
The reviewer thanks the applicant for providing budget details. |
|
| Norton Heather - Score: 87.000 | |
|
Clear goals, objectives and strategies. The opportunities and programs are thoughtful curated. The number of individuals currently served is really low considering the investment of funding into the program opportunities. Points removed from Accessibility due to lack of description of policies and procedures and date of 504 Self Evaluation. |
|
| Overton Robert - Score: 90.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |
| Wolfe Bell Erin - Score: 84.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |