Scores and Comments
19.c.ps.170.491
Museum of Discovery and Science, Inc.
Application Details |
|
|---|---|
| Proposal Type | General Program Support - Discipline-Based |
| Request Amount |
$150,000
|
| Total Score | 654.000 |
| Average Score | 93.429 |
Panelist Scores
| Panelist | Excellence | Impact | Management | Accessibility | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esler Jennifer | 40 | 29 | 20 | 8 | 97 |
| Gelman Elizabeth | 40 | 30 | 20 | 10 | 100 |
| Hughes Michael | 38 | 28 | 18 | 8 | 92 |
| Joseph Samuel | 36 | 28 | 19 | 10 | 93 |
| Norton Heather | 40 | 30 | 19 | 9 | 98 |
| Overton Robert | 37 | 27 | 18 | 9 | 91 |
| Wolfe Bell Erin | 35 | 25 | 16 | 7 | 83 |
Comments |
|
|---|---|
| Esler Jennifer - Score: 97.000 | |
| MODS provides critically important STEM education to its community and audiences through excellent programs and exhibitions. MODS reaches an amazing number of people and uses multiple marketing channels. With 14 years of annual surpluses MODS is beautifully managed. Although accessible, have to score an 8 here due to date of completing evaluation. | |
| Gelman Elizabeth - Score: 100.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |
| Hughes Michael - Score: 92.000 | |
|
I would have liked to see more information on service to underserved communities and those programs. The website feels very commercial. |
|
| Joseph Samuel - Score: 93.000 | |
|
|
|
| Norton Heather - Score: 98.000 | |
| Cleary articulated mission, goals and objectives. Strong impact reporting, financial explanation and history. Surprised evaluation strategy did not mention inclusion of visitor studies beyond demographics/attendance. With such a strong focus on STEM learning I would have anticipated more detail about evaluation tied to visitor engagement and learning outcomes. Accessibility lost 1 point due to 504 Self Evaluation completed in last 5 years | |
| Overton Robert - Score: 91.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |
| Wolfe Bell Erin - Score: 83.000 | |
| {No comments provided.} | |